Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Smartpay provides EFTPOS and integrated point-of-sale services for merchants, offering two primary commercial plans: Smartpay Zero Cost™ EFTPOS and Simple Flat Rate. The service bundles terminals, POS integrations and merchant-fee options that aim to change how businesses meet card acceptance costs.
Smartpay markets features such as automated surcharging, portable terminals, POS subscription offers and claims of no lock-in for some plans; turnover thresholds and setup fees can affect charges.
Source: Smartpay product pages and plan descriptions indicate these features and program names.
Smartpay publicly describes two main plan structures and a range of bundle options for small and larger merchants. Specific per-transaction rates and terminal rental arrangements are presented as negotiated or varied by merchant profile rather than fixed flat retail prices on the public site.
Known, service-specific facts include a turnover threshold of A$10,000 per month that affects terminal rental under the Zero Cost plan and a set-up fee item expressed as $90 + GST that may apply if early exit conditions are met.
| Plan | Typical pricing (public) | Contract/term note | Notable features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smartpay Zero Cost™ EFTPOS | Varies | Terminal rental waived if monthly card transactions exceed A$10,000 | Merchant surcharge model to offset fees; portable terminal; automated surcharging. |
| Simple Flat Rate | Varies | No lock-in contract stated; setup fee of A$90 + GST may be charged if you leave before 12 months | Single flat percentage for Visa/Mastercard transactions; predictable statements. |
Because public pages do not list fixed merchant rates, plan costs are normally presented as tailored quotes.
Smartpay’s terms and product pages reference commercial triggers that affect cancellations such as terminal return obligations, minimum turnover conditions tied to rental waivers, and setup fee adjustments for early termination.
Practical implications to expect: billing cycles are monthly, rental or merchant fees can continue until contractual conditions are satisfied, and adjustments (including retention of a setup fee) may apply if exit occurs within promotional windows. These are plan-specific and appear in the public plan text.
Public consumer feedback shows a mix of positive outcomes about cost savings and negative reports focused on billing and returns. Positive mentions highlight savings under the surcharge model and the availability of bundled POS subscriptions; negative reports most commonly concern ongoing debits after an attempted cancellation and trouble with returning terminals.
Representative customer phrasing posted on review sites includes short critical remarks such as "Extremely poor service from Smart pay." and longer accounts describing repeated debits after attempted closure of accounts. These comments illustrate operational friction points reported by merchants.
Recurring themes from reviews are inconsistent internal communications, disputes over lost or late-returned terminals, and disagreement about when rental or setup fees stop. Many reports show escalation is required to secure refunds or to stop ongoing billing.
Practical takeaway: expect plan-specific exit conditions to matter (for example the A$10,000 threshold or the A$90 + GST setup fee), and prepare to reconcile final statements against the contractual terms you accepted.
Keep these items organised and timestamped; they form the evidentiary core for any billing dispute or complaint.
The ePayments Code and related financial dispute frameworks provide protections that can apply where a subscriber is bound by the Code or where a financial institution handles the disputed payment. Smartpay’s product setup and dispute handling will intersect with those frameworks when the company is a subscriber or when card issuers are involved.
Consequently, contractual obligations under Smartpay’s merchant terms operate alongside statutory and code-based protections; this means outcomes can depend both on the contract wording and whether the matter falls within the ePayments Code or AFCA remit.
Chargeback and dispute handling is a distinct process from cancellation and operates through card schemes and acquiring banks; Smartpay’s merchant guidance and help resources indicate what evidence merchants may need for chargeback defence. Public guidance from Smartpay lists the types of evidence used to contest a chargeback and notes that chargeback fees may not be refundable.
When a refund or reversal is appropriate, timing and method of credit will depend on contractual terms and the payment rails involved; expect a reconciliation period and possible investigatory windows before a final refund is posted.
Billing is presented as monthly for merchant statements and settlement; proration of fees on partial months depends on the contract terms you agreed and the plan structure. Smartpay public pages and merchant FAQs emphasise monthly statements and settlement timelines.
Refunds, when granted, typically follow reconciliation and investigation and may appear on a subsequent statement cycle rather than immediately. This is consistent with standard acquiring and reconciliation practices described in merchant materials.
| Cancellation factor | How it can affect final balance |
|---|---|
| Terminal rental and returns | Charges may continue until contractual conditions around hardware are satisfied; disputed returns are a common source of ongoing charges. |
| Promotional setup fees | Setup or promotional fees may be payable if exit occurs inside a promotional window (publicly described as $90 + GST condition). |
| Chargebacks | Chargeback fees and processes are handled by the acquiring flow; fees may not be refunded if a chargeback is unsuccessful. |
Frame any disagreement in contractual terms by citing the exact clause in your merchant agreement that governs fees, returns and termination. Keep copies of the version of terms in force at the time of contracting; those terms are often decisive.
Where a payment dispute involves unauthorised transactions, mistaken payments or card chargebacks, the ePayments Code and AFCA processes are relevant avenues for escalation depending on whether the parties and payments fall under those schemes.
After the cancellation event, continue to monitor your merchant statements and bank account for at least two subsequent billing cycles to confirm there are no residual debits or unexpected recharges. Request and retain any final account statement or reconciliation documentation issued by Smartpay for your records.
If a post-cancellation charge appears that you dispute, use your documented evidence to raise the issue through the provider’s internal dispute process and, if unresolved, through external dispute resolution schemes such as AFCA or relevant regulators. External remedies can take time, so maintain organised documentation and legal counsel if losses are material.
Finally, consider the operational consequences for your business such as updating payment acceptance processes, verifying any remaining terminal inventory and ensuring accounting entries reflect the final reconciled balances with Smartpay.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Zoe Wright
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.