Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Moerie is a direct-to-consumer hair and beauty brand that sells mineral-enriched haircare, serums and supplements through one-time purchases and an auto-delivery subscription model. The product line commonly bundles shampoo, conditioner, a growth spray and a repair mask into tiered packages with a subscribe-and-save option advertised as a lower recurring price versus the one-time purchase price. This model means many customers enter an initial discount and then face periodic recharges on a set frequency. Official help documentation confirms subscriptions are active after the first charge and subject to the brand’s stated renewal terms.
Moerie operates from a US-registered business address and is sold through its official site and a range of third-party retailers. Product listings and promotional materials show both one-time and recurring purchase routes, with recurring orders typically billed on a timed cycle tied to the bundle selected. Pricing on marketing pages is shown in USD; marketplace listings and independent reviewers report recurring and one-off prices that vary with promotions.
| Plan | Typical one-time price (approx A$) | Typical subscribe price (approx A$) |
|---|---|---|
| Essential starter (shampoo + conditioner) | A$104.84 (approx) | A$85.43 (approx) |
| Ultimate growth (shampoo + conditioner + spray) | A$130.34 (approx) | A$97.48 (approx) |
| Ultimate growth & repair (full kit) | A$155.76 (approx) | A$104.84 (approx) |
Notes: the table converts published USD offer prices into AUD using a recent mid-market exchange rate; amounts are approximate and subject to promotional variations. Pricing sources and conversions are compiled from product listings and independent reviews.
| Purchase type | Billing cadence | Common features |
|---|---|---|
| One-time purchase | Single payment | Pay full advertised price; no auto-recharge |
| Subscription | Recurring (timed interval) | Discounted first or ongoing price; automatic recharges; renewal terms apply |
Moerie’s publicly stated policy indicates subscriptions take effect after the initial recharge and that cancellation is acknowledged in the company’s terms and support material. The help content specifically notes that cancellation is possible after the first recharge and highlights pricing consequences if cancellation occurs before a second charge: customers may be required to make up the difference between the subscription discounted price and the standard one-time order price. This is a service-specific constraint that affects refund calculations.
Practical billing effects to expect with Moerie include regular renewal attempts at the chosen cadence, potential proration rules depending on the billing period, and the possibility of a follow-up dispatch around renewal. Some promotions and discounted trial-type offers appear to require a subsequent full-price charge to satisfy the promotional terms; that design changes how refunds or early cancellations are handled in practice.
Cooling-off and change-of-mind refunds are not universally guaranteed under merchant terms for beauty and consumable items. Moerie’s return and refund positions described in independent reviews indicate sealed items may have a limited return window while opened consumables are often excluded. This interacts with subscription refunds where merchants typically link refund eligibility to whether the subscription recharge was completed and whether the product returned meets the merchant’s return policy.
Public reviews and forum threads show a split of experiences: some buyers report straightforward responses and refunds, while a sizeable share report difficulty stopping future charges and long response times from the brand. Complaints commonly reference unexpected recharges, difficulty getting acknowledgement, and confusion over promotional terms that trigger higher follow-up charges.
Positive reports exist where customers confirm hair improvement and state they received prompt assistance when requesting subscription adjustments. Review platforms capture both the positive product feedback and the critical billing-related narratives, so both outcomes are present in public feedback.
Users repeatedly flag several recurring issues: unclear renewal timing for discounted offers, automatic recharges at higher prices than the initial promotion, and mixed experiences with refund eligibility. Several threads advise close monitoring of the second scheduled charge because promotional pricing sometimes converts to full-price billing at renewal.
Practical takeaways from public reports: document every purchase, check the precise terms attached to promotional prices, and expect that a subscription may carry conditions requiring a subsequent purchase before a full cancellation benefit is realised. These user-sourced observations reflect consistent patterns across multiple review sites.
The Australian consumer regulator has taken action against subscription models that mislead or make cancellation difficult; regulators expect renewal and cancellation terms to be clear and fair. If Moerie’s renewal communications or promotional terms are ambiguous, these are the kinds of features that attract regulatory attention. This means consumers can rely on general unfair contract and misleading conduct protections if the subscription terms were not made sufficiently clear at the time of sale.
The consumer guarantee regime does not create a universal right to a change-of-mind refund for trial subscriptions, but it does require merchants to avoid misleading statements about price, obligations and how to stop automatic renewals. If advertised savings are conditional on future purchases, the conditions must be clearly disclosed. For Moerie customers, these legal points are the framework to assess the merchant’s cancellation and refund communications.
If charges appear unauthorised or inconsistent with the agreed terms, bank dispute and card scheme chargeback rules are an established remedy. Issuers and schemes commonly provide a window to raise disputes (often up to around 120 days for card schemes, with extensions in specific circumstances), and individual bank procedures specify how long investigations take. Early action preserves options.
Escalation paths can include the card issuer’s dispute process and, where domestic complaint handling fails, referral to an independent external dispute resolution scheme. For conduct that looks algorithmically or systematically misleading (for example, hard-to-cancel auto-renewal traps), consumer protection agencies monitor and have pursued enforcement against businesses that fall short of fair practice. Keep documentation to support any formal dispute or regulator complaint.
After a cancellation is accepted under the merchant’s process, expect a confirmation record, a final charge or a prorated adjustment depending on the timing relative to the billing cycle and any promotional conditions tied to a follow-up purchase. Allow several billing cycles to verify that automatic recharges have stopped and monitor statements closely.
If a charge appears after cancellation or if refunding is refused despite documented entitlement, use your transaction records to raise a dispute with your card provider and refer to regulator guidance on unfair renewal practices. If the merchant’s terms imposed a post-cancellation price-difference condition, check the exact wording in the terms you accepted and include that wording with any complaints.
Next steps: maintain an organised folder of all related documentation, watch the bank statements for two billing cycles, and consider a formal dispute route if charges persist or the merchant’s response is inadequate. Where there is suspected misleading conduct, regulator complaints citing relevant documentation are an available pathway to seek redress.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Lachlan Harris
Former postal advisor · 3 years experience
Former postal-services advisor and e-signature specialist, I have been writing for Postclic for 3 years to demystify legally binding mail for everyday users.