Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Warhammer Plus is the official digital subscription service from Games Workshop that bundles original animated series, hobby shows, app access and a digital lore vault for fans of Warhammer 40,000 and Age of Sigmar. The service also offers subscriber perks such as a free commemorative miniature (with eligibility timetables that differ between monthly and annual members), periodic discounts for official merchandise and access to the Warhammer 40,000 and Age of Sigmar companion apps. The official subscription options explicitly list an AUD price and state that an annual plan effectively provides 12 months for the price of nine.
The service lists two primary recurring plans with local AUD pricing and stated benefit differences for miniatures and app access. Prices are shown in AUD for users in this market. These figures are the provider's published rates and may change; check official sources for the latest amounts.
| Plan | Billing frequency | Published AUD price | Key difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Monthly | A$11.99/month | Pay month-to-month; miniature eligibility after 12 consecutive months. |
| Annual | Yearly | A$95.99/year | Paid yearly; miniature eligibility after 1 month; advertised as 12 months for price of 9. |
These prices and the miniature eligibility wording are published by the provider and reflect the baseline billing expectations for local subscribers.
When you cancel a recurring subscription the common commercial outcome is that access continues until the end of the paid billing period and further charges stop at the next renewal. Warhammer Plus documentation indicates annual versus monthly eligibility rules for the free miniature, which can affect refunds and entitlements if a cancellation occurs before eligibility is met.
This means that timing matters: cancelling during an active month normally does not produce a pro rata refund for the remainder of that billing period unless the provider's terms or consumer law require otherwise.
Refund outcomes for Warhammer Plus depend on plan type, timing and the specific product or benefit involved. Published guidance and related support pages show that certain kit or premium-item refunds are handled on an issue-by-issue basis for premium kit subscriptions and that entitlement to a free miniature is tied to continuous subscription periods.
In practice this means:
Public user feedback shows a mix of views on value and friction when members decide to end subscriptions. Many reviews praise select content pieces and the companion apps, while a notable subset of complaints focuses on perceived low content volume, the value proposition of miniatures and difficulties around stopping recurring billing. Some reviewers state they used payment-provider controls as a workaround to stop future charges.
Representative user phrasing includes short, pointed statements such as "Warhammer plus is a con" and reports that refunds or requests were challenged or denied quickly when users sought them - these are public sentiments recorded on review and forum sites. Quoted language has been shortened and paraphrased to reflect the public record.
From published user experiences two recurring themes emerge: perceived low content versus cost and friction when trying to stop recurring charges or secure refunds. Several reports describe using a payment provider as a stopgap when they could not obtain a refund through the service.
Practical takeaways from these reports:
Australian consumer protections apply to digital content and services in limited but important ways: consumers have remedies where a service is not of acceptable quality, not fit for purpose or not delivered as described. This ties to a Warhammer Plus subscription where access to apps or promised content fails to match the advertised benefits. Use these rights when disputing non-delivery or significant defects.
However, cooling-off rights are not automatic for online digital subscriptions once services are delivered; refund eligibility often turns on whether content was used or whether the service was materially different from the description. Always align any consumer law claim with the published provider terms and the specific facts of your account.
When a payment is unexpected or a refund is refused, there are parallel avenues: follow the provider's published complaint procedures and, where appropriate, raise a payment dispute with your financial institution. Use documentation to support your position and keep timelines tight.
Note: chargebacks and payment disputes are complementary to formal consumer complaints. A financial dispute typically requires proof of the charge, the date, and evidence you attempted to resolve the issue with the provider. Be precise in what you claim: non-delivery, unauthorised transaction, or poor quality are different legal bases and need different evidence.
After you request cancellation you should expect the following commercial outcomes in typical scenarios: continued access until the end of the paid billing period, cessation of future recurring charges, and no automatic pro rata refund unless specifically promised. Annual subscriptions that include an early miniature entitlement are often governed by the provider's eligibility rules and may alter refund outcomes if cancelled shortly after signup.
If entitlement to a promotional item was the reason for subscribing, confirm whether cancellation affects the right to claim that promotion before you cancel. If the provider has already marked you as eligible, check your documentation for the claim date and delivery status.
When preparing to cancel or dispute a charge, follow a structured approach: gather the documentation checklist items, note exact dates and amounts, and be clear about what remedy you seek (refund, partial refund, or correction). Keep records of everything you rely on.
In consumer disputes, communicate facts clearly and keep the narrative focused: dates, amounts, entitlement thresholds and the specific harm or mismatch between advertised and delivered service. This makes it easier to escalate if necessary.
| Comparison | Monthly plan | Annual plan |
|---|---|---|
| Typical AUD cost | A$11.99/month | A$95.99/year |
| Miniature eligibility | After 12 consecutive months | After 1 month |
| Best for | Short-term access or trial | Regular viewers who want annual value and faster miniature claim |
Be methodical: gather the documentation checklist and align your desired remedy with the contractual entitlements published by the service. Timing is often decisive for subscription benefits and refund eligibility, so prioritise exact dates and amounts when you prepare your case.
If a dispute escalates, consumer protection agencies can advise on legal rights for digital services and the difference between contractual promises and statutory guarantees. Use them when a provider refuses to address a clear failure of service quality or delivery.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Grace Lee
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.