Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Zap Hosting is a commercial provider of game and application hosting, virtual private servers (VPS), dedicated servers and associated add-ons. The platform markets instant provisioning for a wide range of game server titles, voice servers, webspace and marketplace items; it also offers prepaid (one-off) and contract (recurring) settlement models and a so-called lifetime server product. Zap Hosting operates internationally from Germany and publishes public documentation on order revocation, cancellation periods and settlement types.
The vendor displays entry-level price points on its storefront for categories such as gameservers, voiceservers, vServers and dedicated hardware. Prices shown on the storefront use a currency symbol without a local currency label and vary by configuration and location. The official documentation clarifies the difference between prepaid orders and contract subscriptions, and sets specific termination and cancellation rules for each.
Below is a compact snapshot based on the public storefront listings and an approximate conversion to AUD for common entry points. These A$ figures are indicative and marked “approx”. Always check live pricing for exact totals and taxes before purchase.
| Plan type | Site starting price | Approx starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Gameserver (basic) | $3.12 (store) | A$5.00 (approx) |
| Voiceserver (basic) | $2.22 (store) | A$3.55 (approx) |
| vServer (VPS) entry | $9.01 (store) | A$14.42 (approx) |
| Dedicated server (entry) | $48.59 (store) | A$77.74 (approx) |
Notes: the storefront values above are taken from the vendor’s public pages and converted to AUD using contemporaneous exchange metrics; conversions are approximate and do not include taxes, location surcharges or optional extras.
Framework: Zap Hosting distinguishes between contract-settlement (recurring subscription) products and prepaid one-off purchases. Prepaid products are described as paid upfront with no ongoing commitment; contract products create a recurring obligation subject to a cancellation period.
Revocation (cooling-off type right): Zap Hosting publishes a 14 day revocation window for product termination. The provider states it does not offer "full refunds" under its general terms but offers a credit refund in the vendor’s internal currency (ZAP Coins) after a small administrative fee. This is a contractual position that interacts with statutory consumer rights discussed below.
Cancellation windows for recurring contracts: the vendor’s published cancellation period is currently 7 days for most contract products and 28 days for root servers and dedicated servers. That means a cancellation request must be effective within the prescribed window before renewal to avoid automatic extension. Zap Hosting warns that failure to cancel in time results in renewal for another billing interval.
Proration and refunds: the documentation indicates limited refundability. Prepaid servers are described as closed automatically without extra cost if payments are not continued; contract servers are subject to the cancellation timing and refund approach stated above, with refunds often issued as account credits rather than direct refunds to the original payment method.
Public feedback is mixed. Many customers post positive comments about server performance and low entry pricing on review platforms. At the same time, a non-trivial number of reports on Trustpilot and community forums describe disputes over post-cancellation charges, credits issued instead of cash refunds, and account suspensions during payment or refund disputes. These messages appear repeatedly across independent channels.
Examples from public posts include claims of: unexpected renewals, invoices issued after a user thought they had cancelled, refunds provided as ZAP Coins rather than funds, small administrative fees deducted from revocations, and occasional long delays in dispute resolution. Some users report successful refunds after escalation; others report escalation to payment providers or consumer bodies.
Users commonly highlight three practical themes: the necessity of tracking renewal dates, the difference between account credit and cash refunds, and the need to document all interactions. Several customers report being charged when they expected closure; conversely some customers report routine, uneventful cancellations. These patterns underscore variability in outcomes depending on timing, settlement type and the product class.
Statutory overlay: Australian consumer guarantees apply to services and digital content and cannot be contracted out of. If a service is not supplied with due care and skill or is not fit for purpose, a consumer may be entitled to remedies including a refund, repair or repeat supply depending on whether the failure is major. The ACCC has emphasised that online return policies must not misrepresent legal rights.
Interaction with Zap Hosting terms: the vendor’s 14 day revocation and the practice of issuing account credit are contractual terms that sit alongside statutory guarantees. Where the service is defective or substantially different from what was promised, Australian law can require a cash refund or other remedy notwithstanding a contractual “no refund” or credit-only rule. Consumers should consider these remedies when evaluating a dispute.
| Feature | Contract settlement | Prepaid settlement |
|---|---|---|
| Billing cadence | Recurring; defined by billing interval | Paid once; no ongoing commitment |
| Cancellation period | 7 days (most products) / 28 days (root/dedicated) | No cancellation period required |
| Refunds | Limited; often credit refund and admin fee applies | Closed automatically if unpaid; refunds uncommon |
| Provider-stated revocation | 14 day revocation with ZAP Coins credit option | Not applicable |
Dispute channels: if you believe a charge is improper, payment providers and card issuers have dispute procedures (chargebacks). Initiating a formal dispute may have pros and cons: it can produce a reversal, but the vendor may respond and take protective measures such as suspending services pending investigation. Several public reports indicate account suspension or automated collection warnings during dispute escalations.
Regulatory escalation: where statutory remedies are apparent and negotiation fails, lodging a complaint with the relevant consumer affairs agency (for example ACCC and state/territory fair trading bodies) is an available escalation pathway. Provide the documentation checklist items when lodging a complaint.
Prepare a written record that identifies the factual timeline: purchase, any faults, cancellation attempt and billing events. Preserve evidence of the provider’s published terms as they appeared at the time of sale. These records form the factual basis for a statutory consumer guarantee claim or a payment dispute.
When seeking a refund or remedy, frame requests around contractual breaches or consumer guarantee failures (for example, material non-performance). Cite the applicable provision in the provider’s terms if it contradicts statutory guarantees, and use regulatory guidance where relevant.
Monitor payment instruments and statements for at least two billing cycles to confirm no further charges were processed. Keep copies of all accounting entries and any reversal documentation if a dispute is invoked. Maintain your evidence bundle and be prepared to present it to the payment provider or a consumer agency if required.
If a refund is issued as account credit and you require a cash refund, insist on the legal basis for a cash remedy: reference consumer guarantees and the vendor’s terms where applicable. If discussions stall, escalate formally through your payment provider and consider lodging a complaint with the consumer protection regulator.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Mason King
eIDAS legal expert · 3 years experience
Lawyer specialized in digital trust services and the eIDAS regulation, I have been helping individuals and businesses send legally binding certified mail for 3 years.