Cancellation service N°1 in Australia
Contract number:
To the attention of:
Cancellation Department – Lexington Law
Suite A35, 4th floor, Lexington Corporate Centre 24–32 Lexington Drive
2153 Bella Vista
Subject: Contract Cancellation – Certified Email Notification
Dear Sir or Madam,
I hereby notify you of my decision to terminate contract number relating to the Lexington Law service. This notification constitutes a firm, clear and unequivocal intention to cancel the contract, effective at the earliest possible date or in accordance with the applicable contractual notice period.
I kindly request that you take all necessary measures to:
– cease all billing from the effective date of cancellation;
– confirm in writing the proper receipt of this request;
– and, where applicable, send me the final statement or balance confirmation.
This cancellation is sent to you by certified email. The sending, timestamping and integrity of the content are established, making it equivalent proof meeting the requirements of electronic evidence. You therefore have all the necessary elements to process this cancellation properly, in accordance with the applicable principles regarding written notification and contractual freedom.
In accordance with the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and data protection regulations, I also request that you:
– delete all my personal data not necessary for your legal or accounting obligations;
– close any associated personal account;
– and confirm to me the effective deletion of data in accordance with applicable rights regarding privacy protection.
I retain a complete copy of this notification as well as proof of sending.
Yours sincerely,
16/01/2026
How to Cancel Lexington Law: Step-by-Step Guide
What is Lexington Law
Lexington Law is a US-based credit repair firm that operates through attorney-led teams and paralegal staff to dispute negative items on consumer credit reports and provide credit monitoring and identity-protection adjuncts. The firm markets tiered subscription packages that combine bureau challenges, creditor interventions and monitoring tools; pricing is commonly reported in tiered monthly bands.
From a financial perspective, clients choose Lexington Law when legal-style dispute letters, ongoing advocacy and bundled monitoring justify monthly fees versus a DIY approach. Recent reporting also notes regulatory scrutiny of Lexington Law's marketing and corporate practices, which is relevant when weighing cost against risk.
How cancellations typically work for Lexington Law
Considering that Lexington Law sells subscription-based services with recurring monthly billing and initial setup fees, cancellations normally trigger billing rules tied to the firm’s billing cycle and the firm’s stated policy to charge for services rendered up to the cancellation date. Several service replies and customer reports reference billing through periodic invoice cycles and charges for work completed before an effective termination.
From a financial perspective you should expect: possible a setup or onboarding charge, a recurring monthly charge according to the plan tier, and the firm’s statement that fees may cover work already performed at the time of cancellation. Proration practices vary across credit-repair providers; the commonly reported approach for Lexington Law is to bill for services already provided rather than prorate future unused days.
Cooling-off periods and statutory consumer rights may apply to parts of the contract depending on how the client joined and local consumer law comparatives. Check any written agreement you received when you enrolled for exact wording on refunds, minimum terms and the firm’s refund criteria.
Customer experience and cancellation feedback for Lexington Law
What users report
Public reviews show a split between users who report measurable credit-report changes and those who report poor value or frustrating billing interactions. Review platforms display frequent complaints about continued charges after attempted cancellation and slow responses on refunds, alongside some positive accounts of disputed items being removed.
A sample paraphrase of the pattern found multiple times: customers praise the legal-style dispute work in some cases but often complain they were charged after they thought the account was closed, or that progress stalled while charges continued. Several reviewers describe needing persistence to resolve billing questions.
Recurring issues and practical takeaways
Recurring issues include contested expectations about what fees cover, perceived lack of measurable progress vs cost, and difficulty obtaining timely refunds for charges deemed inappropriate by the consumer. These are the operational risks that carry monetary consequences.
Practical takeaways: from a budget-optimisation view, weigh ongoing monthly cost against likely measurable gains in credit-worthiness and compare to lower-cost alternatives or a DIY dispute strategy. Document interactions, calculate total lifetime cost by multiplying monthly fee by likely engagement months, and treat any promised outcomes as non-guaranteed.
Subscription plans and pricing (approximate, converted to A$)
Service-specific detail: public listings for Lexington Law show a multi-tier structure with lower, mid and premium plans; US-listed monthly rates are commonly reported in the USD banding shown below and have been converted to AUD using a mid-market rate of approximately A$1.50 per US$1 (approx). Use the table as a comparative budgeting guide, not a contractual quote.
| Plan | Typical US listing | Approx monthly cost (A$) |
|---|---|---|
| Lower / basic tier (Concord standard / entry) | ~US$99.95/month | A$150 approx |
| Mid tier (Concord premier / intermediate) | ~US$119.95/month | A$180 approx |
| Premium (Premier plus / advanced) | ~US$139.95/month | A$210 approx |
| Setup/onboarding fees (commonly reported) | US$~89.95 - US$129.95 one-off | A$135 - A$195 approx |
Plan features comparison for Lexington Law
Service-specific detail: reported plan differences typically relate to dispute volume, monitoring features and identity-protection add-ons; premium levels usually bundle identity insurance and more aggressive creditor interventions. Use the comparison to match plan features with expected value.
| Feature | Lower tier | Mid tier | Premium tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bureau disputes | Included - limited | Included - extended | Included - broad |
| Creditor interventions | Basic | Enhanced | Priority/direct interventions |
| Credit monitoring / alerts | Minimal | Report watch / alerts | Full monitoring + score tracker |
| Identity protection | Not always included | Often included | Included with insurance features |
Documentation checklist for cancelling Lexington Law
- Contract copy: keep the written agreement or T&C you received when enrolling.
- Billing records: keep bank or card statements showing all Lexington Law charges.
- Dates and amounts: record the date you asked to end services and the last charge amount.
- Service logs: save any written summaries of actions claimed by the firm (disputes filed, items challenged).
- Refund correspondence: retain any responses regarding refunds or credits.
Disputes, refunds and chargebacks relevant to Lexington Law
Service-specific detail: reviewers and company replies indicate Lexington Law’s position is to charge for work performed up to the cancellation date; that policy is the primary lever when refund eligibility is evaluated. Expect the firm to cite work completed in billing disputes.
From a financial perspective, if you believe a charge is unauthorised or incorrect, your bank or card provider has established dispute and chargeback processes that can reverse transactions under certain conditions. Australian banks and the Banking Code provide tools to list and investigate direct debits and recurring payments. Use those processes if documentary evidence supports your claim.
Short note on consumer protections that matter for Lexington Law
Service-specific detail: when assessing a dispute with Lexington Law, unfair contract term rules and consumer guarantees may be relevant if the contract is a standard-form contract or includes unclear cancellation penalties. Media and legal commentary in recent years emphasise scrutiny of unfair terms for subscription services. Keep any contract language that references cancellations and fee calculations.
Address
- Address: Suite A35, 4th floor, Lexington Corporate Centre 24 - 32 Lexington Drive, Bella Vista NSW 2153
What to do after cancelling Lexington Law
Service-specific detail: after an account closure, monitor for residual charges from Lexington Law that may be billed for services the firm says were performed; cross-check those entries against your documentation checklist and the dates of claimed work.
Actionable next steps from a budget optimisation and consumer-rights perspective: review your bank and card statements for at least three billing cycles, prepare a timeline of events and charges, and decide whether to pursue a chargeback or formal complaint based on documentary evidence of unauthorised or disputed charges.
If you escalate, consider lodging a complaint with relevant consumer authorities or financial ombuds services if available for the payment type; regulators monitor patterns of recurring-billing complaints and may take enforcement action where businesses use unfair or unclear cancellation terms. Keep all records of your complaint and the firm’s responses for regulator review.
From a value perspective: compare the cumulative cost you paid to the measurable changes achieved in your credit report and decide whether a cheaper alternative or DIY dispute strategy yields a better return. If you reallocate the monthly fees to a targeted debt reduction or credit-building product, model the interest savings to assess opportunity cost.
Open perspectives and next steps
Considering that ongoing subscription fees can compound into substantial lifetime costs, re-evaluate the net monetary benefit of continued engagement with Lexington Law versus alternatives such as targeted DIY disputes, a lower-cost provider, or direct negotiation with creditors. Use your documentation to support any formal complaints or disputes and treat the evidence trail as the critical determinant of success.
From a practical point of view, prioritise steps that protect your cashflow: reconcile charges, calculate total spent versus results obtained, and choose the dispute or complaint pathway that offers the strongest documentary support and the most favourable expected recovery.