Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Descript is a cloud-first audio and video editing platform that combines text-based editing, automated transcription and AI tools for creators and teams. It markets tiered subscriptions that bundle transcription hours, AI credits, voice cloning and export options aimed at podcasters, video producers and collaborative teams. The service offers a free tier plus paid plans labelled Creator and Pro, and an enterprise option with custom terms. The published plan differences specify monthly transcription allowances and feature limits that affect how users are billed and what paid features remain available after cancellation.
The vendor lists prices in US dollars by default; the figures below convert those published amounts to approximate Australian dollars using recent mid-market exchange data. Amounts are indicative and rounded. Use the provider's published invoice for the authoritative amount on your account.
| Plan | Published price (USD) | Approximate AU price | Key allocation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creator (monthly) | $12 / editor / month | A$18/month (approx) | ~10 hours transcription / editor per month; export features |
| Pro (monthly) | $24 / editor / month | A$36/month (approx) | ~30 hours transcription / editor per month; Overdub and higher export limits |
| Creator (annual) | $144 billed annually | A$216/year (approx) | Annual billing saves versus monthly |
| Pro (annual) | $288 billed annually | A$432/year (approx) | Higher transcription allocation and enterprise-ready features |
Cancellation and billing are governed by the provider's subscription and refund terms. The published policy states that cancellations are effective at the end of the current billing cycle, not immediately; accounts are then moved to the Free tier while project data remains accessible. This means you retain paid features until the paid period expires.
The refund policy discloses a limited refund window: refund requests for a plan payment are accepted if requested within 48 hours of the invoice date; other charges such as top-ups are final. Cancellations partway through a paid period are generally not prorated. These contract terms are common in SaaS agreements but may be subject to local consumer law remedies.
The service also offers a short-term pause option that can suspend charges for a limited number of months while preserving project data in a restricted state. Pausing is distinct from cancellation in that the account remains linked to the subscription terms at resumption.
Public reviews and complaint threads show a pattern of both straightforward cancellations and disputes about post-cancellation charges and refunds. Several users report that charges continued after they believed they had cancelled, and others describe difficulty obtaining a refund outside the 48-hour window. Short, critical remarks include statements such as: "they continued charging my card" and "no refund even if cancelled first 2 days." These comments appear on consumer review sites and business complaint records.
Recurring issues raised by users include timing mismatches between invoice dates and when consumers discover charges, reliance on a strict 48-hour refund rule, and perceived delays or poor responsiveness from support when seeking remedies. Conversely, some users report successful pauses and orderly downgrades with no further billing. The practical takeaway is to align cancellation timing with the invoicing date and to gather contemporaneous evidence if you later seek a refund.
Australian consumer protection law supplies statutory guarantees that can apply to digital goods and subscription services. If Descript's service fails to meet consumer guarantees - for example if a paid feature is unusable or substantially different from the description - consumers may have remedies including repair, replacement or a refund for the unused portion in cases of major failure. Businesses cannot contract out of these statutory rights.
Nevertheless, change-of-mind requests are treated differently: a subscription vendor's commercial refund window (such as a 48-hour policy) may be legitimate for discretionary refunds but does not override statutory guarantees where a service is defective. When assessing a dispute, document functional failures and timings to support any statutory claim.
When a billing disagreement arises, the recommended legal approach is procedural and evidentiary: assemble invoices, timestamps and any communication records, then present a concise claim referring to the invoice date and the specific statutory or contractual provision at issue. If a commercial refund is declined, you may escalate the matter through your payment provider's formal dispute process or pursue a statutory remedy with the relevant consumer regulator. Keep all documentation.
Chargebacks are a payment-provider remedy that may be available for unauthorised or recurrent charges. Use the dispute channel your payment provider offers and provide the same documentary evidence you would submit to the supplier. Consequences of chargebacks include temporary credit and potential follow-up with the merchant; weigh this option against alternative dispute-resolution steps.
Framework: establish your factual record, check the billing cycle, and identify any work that requires paid features before the paid period ends. Preserve exports or project backups under the terms that apply to your plan. Where the provider offers a pause option, evaluate whether it better protects your projects and avoids loss of paid time.
Detail: note the invoice date and compare it to the published 48-hour refund window for potential reimbursement requests. If you have purchased additional transcription hours or credits, check the published policy for top-up finality since such purchases are commonly non-refundable.
Retain the final invoice, a billing statement showing the payment, and any confirmation reference the provider supplies. Keep project export files and note the date you lost paid feature access. These items form the backbone of any subsequent refund or dispute request.
After the paid period ends, expect an automatic reclassification to the Free tier while your projects remain available with access limited to free-tier capabilities. You should monitor your payment method statements for any unexpected charges and compare them to the invoice schedule. Document any discrepancy immediately.
If you expected a refund under the vendor's short commercial window, expect the provider to request account details and an invoice reference to process a claim. If a claim is refused, you will need to decide whether to escalate via your payment provider or pursue a statutory remedy. Keep a concise timeline of events.
| Post-cancellation item | What to check |
|---|---|
| Bill cycle end date | Confirm the final day you are permitted paid features. |
| Account status | Confirm that the account moved to the free tier and that project files are intact. |
| Unexpected charges | Match any post-cancellation charge to invoice dates and document discrepancies. |
If the provider declines a refund for a major service failure or continues to bill after a demonstrable cancellation, consider lodging a formal complaint with the appropriate consumer authority and, if relevant, your payment provider's dispute process. Allegations that a vendor misstates consumer rights have attracted regulatory action in comparable cases, confirming that statutory protections may prevail over internal commercial windows.
Keep escalation proportionate: supply a succinct timeline, a copy of the invoice and a clear statement of the remedy sought. Regulators and dispute handlers favour concise, evidence-based submissions.
Act methodically: compile your invoice and transaction evidence, export any critical project work, and preserve a dated timeline of events. If you intend to request a refund under the vendor's stated window, do so with the invoice reference in writing and keep a copy. If a refund is refused and you believe the service failed to meet guarantees, escalate with evidence to the payment dispute channel and the consumer regulator.
Consequently, maintain a concise factual record and pursue remedies in stages: supplier request, payment-provider dispute, regulator complaint. This structured approach aligns with contractual principles and maximises the chances of a favourable outcome.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Sophie Clark
eIDAS legal expert · 6 years experience
Lawyer specialized in digital trust services and the eIDAS regulation, I have been helping individuals and businesses send legally binding certified mail for 6 years.