Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Bare Knuckle Tv (the streaming arm of Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship) is a multi-device subscription service that offers live bare-knuckle fighting events, an on-demand library and related original content. The service operates via a direct website subscription and through third-party app marketplaces; content coverage includes monthly live events, archived fights and occasional pay-per-view headline events.
Official support material indicates two main subscription paths: direct website subscriptions and in-app purchases via platforms such as Apple, Google, Roku and Amazon. The operator promotes a monthly option and an annual option, and larger pay-per-view events may sit outside the recurring plan structure.
Public material lists multiple price points depending on purchase channel. App-store metadata shows several in-app purchase options; the operator’s help pages list a standard monthly and yearly price (note: the operator’s published amounts may be denominated in USD and will vary by region and app-store pricing).
| Purchase channel | Typical price (AUD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| App store in-app purchases (Apple metadata) | A$7.49 - A$79.99 | Multiple monthly and yearly in-app options are listed in the Australian App Store metadata. Exact charge depends on the specific SKU and app-store region. |
| Website (operator published) | Approx A$11.98 monthly / Approx A$74.85 yearly | Operator documentation lists prices as $7.99 and $49.99; amounts shown here are converted to AUD and marked approx using recent mid-market rates. Actual local billing may differ. |
Bare Knuckle Tv explicitly recognises two billing routes: direct website sales and third-party billing through app marketplaces. This distinction determines who is contractually responsible for recurring charges, who handles refunds and where a billing dispute must be raised.
| Feature | Direct website subscription | Third-party app marketplace |
|---|---|---|
| Who issues the charge | Service operator (BKFC/BK OTT) | App marketplace (Apple, Google, Roku, Amazon) |
| Refund and dispute route | Operator policy applies; operator processes refunds or credits | Marketplace rules and processes apply; operator may be limited in refund authority |
| Cancellation responsibility (contractual) | Operator-managed subscription terms | Marketplace-managed subscription terms and renewal rules |
Framework: contractual cancellation is governed by the subscription terms agreed at purchase and by the billing route used. Direct website subscriptions are subject to the operator’s terms of use and refund policy. Third-party purchases are additionally governed by the app marketplace terms and the marketplace’s billing engine.
Notice periods and timing: recurring subscriptions generally renew at the end of each billing cycle. Cancelling before renewal typically prevents future charges but does not usually prorate past charges already billed for the active cycle. Whether a cancellation takes immediate effect or simply prevents auto-renewal depends on the contract and the billing route.
Proration and refunds: proration for partial periods is uncommon in subscription streaming services and is governed by the terms and the operator’s refund policy. Refunds for service failings (streaming failures, inaccessible events) are discretionary and often depend on whether the subscription was purchased directly or via an app marketplace. Marketplaces frequently have separate refund windows and criteria.
Cooling-off and consumer guarantees: under consumer law, digital subscriptions are subject to guarantees about supply and quality; however, there is no automatic statutory right to a full refund for a change of mind after access to digital content has started, unless the operator’s terms provide otherwise. For issues of major non-compliance (for example, the service repeatedly fails to stream a paid event), a remedy may be available under consumer guarantees. Tie those principles to your subscription: the route of purchase affects enforcement and remedy options.
Public feedback from app-store reviews, community forums and complaint listings repeatedly mentions streaming performance issues, billing confusion and frustration with refund outcomes. Several users report repeated buffering, failed replays and difficulties reconciling charges. Short user quotes include: "Paid the monthly sign up and as soon as the event started it signed me out" and "The app is absolute junk".
1. Billing confusion: users report duplicate charges and unclear overlap between app-store charges and website purchases. Because marketplaces handle billing independently, double-billing scenarios are a common source of disputes.
2. Refund disputes: multiple complaints indicate refunds for event delivery failures are not consistently granted; outcomes vary by whether the purchase was direct or via a marketplace.
3. Operational caution: record transaction receipts, know which channel you used to subscribe, and document service failures with timestamps and screenshots where possible. Those records materially affect the merits of any dispute.
Contractual framework: your subscription is governed by the operator’s terms of use and the applicable marketplace terms where relevant. The contract sets renewal intervals, refund policies and permitted remedies. Read the terms tied to the purchase channel to identify any express limitations or exclusions.
Consumer guarantees and remedies: if the service fails to meet basic acceptability or is not fit for purpose (for example, repeated inability to view paid live events), consumer protection law may provide remedies such as repair, replacement, refund or compensation for consequential loss in appropriate circumstances. The practical availability of these remedies depends on the billing route and the evidence you can present.
First, identify the contractual counterparty for your charge (operator or marketplace). That determines the applicable dispute mechanism and any time limits for raising a claim. Public reports show customers often encounter different outcomes depending on that distinction.
If a charge appears unauthorised or clearly incorrect, banking chargeback mechanisms may be available as a last-resort remedy; note banks will assess the merits and expect documentation. Chargebacks are not a guaranteed remedy and may carry consequences under the card-issuer terms. Maintain a clear documentation trail before initiating a payment dispute.
Legal checklist rather than procedural instructions: identify the contract you entered, check the renewal date, assess whether the billing route is direct or marketplace, and examine the operator’s refund policy for the circumstances you face. Confirm whether your issue qualifies under consumer guarantees for a remedy.
Record the desired outcome before taking formal action: stop future renewals, obtain a refund, or seek a partial credit. Ensure that your evidence links the loss to the service failure or to an incorrect charge. Public reports indicate that outcomes are strongly influenced by the clarity of this evidence.
Expectation management: cancelling a subscription often prevents further renewals but does not always trigger refunds for the current billing period. For direct purchases the operator’s terms control refunds; for marketplace purchases, marketplace rules often control refunds. Historically reported outcomes for Bare Knuckle Tv show mixed results on refunds for service interruptions.
Timelines: dispute resolution and refund processing times vary. Marketplaces and operators each publish their own processing windows and may require supporting evidence. Be prepared for follow-up requests and retain copies of every document you provide.
Actions to preserve rights: continue to retain receipts and the documentation checklist items. Monitor your card or account statement for any unexpected subsequent charges. If a further charge appears, document it and proceed under the dispute mechanisms available to your payment method.
If relying on consumer guarantees or statutory remedies, prepare a concise chronology of failures and the supporting evidence; this improves the efficacy of any formal complaint to a consumer regulator or a dispute-resolution body. Consider escalation only after you have exhausted contractual complaint channels and assembled your supporting documents.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Zoe Wright
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.