
Cancellation service #1 in United States

Dear Sir or Madam,
I hereby notify you of my decision to terminate the contract relating to the Reface AI service.
This notification constitutes a firm, clear and unequivocal intention to cancel the contract, effective at the earliest possible date or in accordance with the applicable contractual period.
Please take all necessary measures to:
– cease all billing from the effective date of cancellation;
– confirm in writing the proper processing of this request;
– and, if applicable, send me the final statement or balance confirmation.
This cancellation is addressed to you by certified e-mail. The sending, timestamping and content integrity are established, making it a probative document meeting electronic proof requirements. You therefore have all the necessary elements to proceed with regular processing of this cancellation, in accordance with applicable principles regarding written notification and contractual freedom.
In accordance with personal data protection rules, I also request:
– deletion of all my data not necessary for your legal or accounting obligations;
– closure of any associated personal account;
– and confirmation of actual data deletion according to applicable privacy rights.
I retain a complete copy of this notification as well as proof of sending.
How to Cancel Reface AI: Complete Guide
What is Reface AI
Reface AI is a mobile-first suite of visual apps that use artificial intelligence to transform faces in photos and videos. The family of products includes a face-swap app, AI avatar and headshot generators, and photo/video restyling tools. The service is widely distributed through major app stores and is operated by NEOCORTEXT, INC., which lists multiple in-app subscription tiers and recurring billing options. Users typically download the app for quick, creative edits and access expanded features through paid plans. Key public-facing sources describe the product, its features, and the availability of premium subscriptions.
subscription plans and pricing at a glance
Public app store listings show a range of in-app purchase options with common offerings including weekly, monthly, and annual plans. Prices can vary by region and over time. The table below gives representative examples drawn from the U.S. app listing and related app-store data available to consumers. Use this table for orientation; confirm the exact plan and price in your app store record or receipt.
| plan | typical price (US example) | notes |
|---|---|---|
| weekly | $3.99 (example) | short-term access, recurring each week |
| monthly | $12.99 (example) | automatic renewal common |
| annual | $24.99 (example) | lower effective monthly cost |
what users pay attention to
Many users select a trial or short-term plan to test features before committing to longer terms. Subscriptions often auto-renew unless the user stops renewal before the next billing cycle. Consumers are advised to retain receipts and in-app purchase confirmations because those records establish the plan, price, and billing cadence for disputes or refund requests.
why people cancel
People cancel for several practical reasons: the app did not meet expectations, billing was confusing or higher than anticipated, trial-to-paid conversions were unexpected, or duplicate or repeated charges appeared. Some users report problems with unwanted recurring charges and difficulty stopping renewals. These issues generate stress and lead consumers to seek firm, provable ways to end a contract and stop future billing. Preserving evidence and following a durable cancellation route are the priorities every consumer should have.
analysis of customer experiences with cancellation
Independent review sites and public consumer feedback show recurring themes. Many reviewers report difficulty identifying how to stop charges, unexpected weekly or periodic billing, and delays or unresponsiveness when seeking a refund. Several reviewers describe repeated charges after they attempted to stop access. These accounts indicate frustration with transparency and with the practical steps needed to cut off a subscription. Representative consumer reports include direct accounts of repeated weekly charges and statements that cancelling required more effort than expected.
typical complaints found in reviews include unclear trial terms, rapid or high-frequency renewal cycles, and a perception that cancellation was not simple to execute. Some reviewers said they had to dispute charges with their card issuer because other avenues felt ineffective. A smaller set of users reported satisfactory outcomes when the company acknowledged errors and issued refunds. The variety of experiences underscores the importance of using a cancellation method that creates an undeniable paper trail.
what works and what doesn't
What works: establishing clear, dated evidence that you withdrew consent to continue billing. What does not work: relying on ephemeral or undocumented verbal assertions. In contested cases, documentation is the decisive factor. Consumers who kept records of the purchase, the billing date, and a dated, verifiable cancellation request had stronger positions when seeking refunds or filing formal complaints. Consumer advice drawn from public reviews consistently favors methods that provide legal proof of the cancellation request.
legal context and consumer protections
U.S. consumer protection law and recent state-level updates address automatic renewals and trial-to-paid conversions. Some states require businesses to disclose auto-renewal terms clearly and to provide straightforward cancellation methods. California’s automatic renewal law is an example of modern regulation designed to protect consumers; it requires clear consent for auto-renewals and certain advance notices for renewals and changes in fees. Regulators may enforce disclosure and cancellation requirements when a business’s practices fall short. Knowing relevant protection frameworks helps consumers decide how to act if a cancellation does not stop charges.
The Federal Trade Commission gathers reports about unfair billing practices and maintains complaint channels for deceptive subscription offers. Filing a complaint with a regulator can be an appropriate escalation step after direct attempts to stop billing fail and after preserving documentation. Card issuers also offer dispute and chargeback routes that consumers can use when billed for services they attempted to cancel. Keep in mind that remedies differ by situation and by jurisdiction; timely action and evidence improve chances of success.
the problem-solution framework for cancelling
Problem: unclear terms, recurring charges, and poor cancellation evidence. Solution: choose a cancellation path that produces verifiable, dated proof and that can be used later in a dispute. The safest, most legally defensible avenue is to create a record that demonstrates your intent to stop the subscription and to have that record be independently verifiable by the recipient. For reasons discussed below, registered postal mail achieves that objective in most circumstances.
postal mail as the primary cancellation method
Use registered postal mail as the recommended and exclusive cancellation route. Registered mail provides a numbered record, a date stamp, and a verifiable chain of custody. Courts and regulators commonly treat registered mail receipts and return-receipt evidence as strong documentary proof that a party received a notice. For consumers who face repeated or unexplained charges, that strength matters. Registered postal mail puts control in the sender’s hands and converts a simple request into a legally significant document.
advantages of registered postal mail
- verifiability: the postal service issues tracking and delivery records that show when the package arrived at the recipient’s address.
- date stamping: the date on the registered item establishes when the notice was sent and, crucially, when the recipient had notice of your cancellation request.
- chain of custody: registered mail is treated as handled specially; that status supports the integrity of the evidence if a dispute progresses to a legal or regulatory forum.
- useful for disputes: banks, card processors, and regulators accept registered dispatch and delivery proof as strong support when reviewing refund or chargeback claims.
focus on registered mail does not remove the need to keep your own records. Save receipts, app-store purchase records, and bank statements that show the charge and its frequency. Paired with registered mail evidence, these records build a coherent timeline for your case.
what to include in your cancellation letter (general principles)
Do not use this section as a template. Instead, follow these general principles about content: identify yourself clearly, reference the subscription or transaction by date and purchase receipt where possible, state that you withdraw consent to continue the service, request confirmation of cancellation and cessation of future billing, and sign the communication. Keep the language concise, unambiguous, and factual. Preserve copies of everything you send and any postal receipts you receive. Strong, dated wording that shows your intent to end the contract is the core element regulators and banks will rely on if you contest later charges.
timing, notice periods, and billing cycles
Review your billing cadence and send your registered notice so the recipient has reasonable time before the next renewal. If an auto-renewal occurs on a fixed date, aim for delivery before that date. State rules may require advance notice in certain situations, and some laws expect businesses to provide renewal notices. Because policies vary, act early enough to allow delivery and acknowledgment. When a charge has already been processed, the registered mailing still establishes your request and may be required for refunds or disputes. Keep proof of delivery to support refund or chargeback claims.
common obstacles and how registered mail helps
Obstacle: lack of clear contact points and delayed responses. Registered mail addresses that obstacle by forcing a documented exchange. Obstacle: disputed timing where a company claims it never got a cancellation. A postal return receipt or tracking confirmation rebuts that claim. Obstacle: repeated billing after a cancellation attempt. If subsequent charges appear, the registered mail record supports a claim to the bank, card network, or regulator that you attempted to terminate the arrangement. Public reviewers who had problems often cited the absence of solid evidence for their cancellation attempts. Registered mail directly addresses that shortcoming.
practical risks and limits of registered mail
Registered mail is highly useful but not a magic cure. A company might still dispute a refund or deny responsibility on contractual grounds. In some settings, the app store or payment processor’s rules can affect the outcome of a chargeback. Still, registered mail strengthens your legal posture and is frequently persuasive to financial institutions and regulators when paired with purchase records and timely action. If charges continue after registered notice, escalate with your card issuer and with consumer protection authorities while keeping all records.
practical solutions for simplifying registered mail
To make the process easier: Postclic is a service that lets users send registered or simple letters without a printer. You don't need to move: Postclic prints, stamps and sends your letter. Dozens of ready-to-use templates for cancellations: telecommunications, insurance, energy, various subscriptions are available. Secure sending with return receipt and legal value equivalent to physical sending. This option can remove logistical barriers for people who want the legal strength of registered dispatch but cannot print or visit a postal counter. Include Postclic as one practical tool among your records-focused approach.
using evidence with banks and regulators
When you challenge a charge, present the timeline, the purchase receipt, bank statements, and proof of registered dispatch and delivery. The bank’s dispute team will evaluate the totality of evidence. Consumer protection agencies and state attorneys general also review complaint packets and may take action when there is a pattern of consumer harm. Public complaint portals accept supporting materials in many cases, and a clear, documented history is essential for a remedy.
customer stories and lessons learned
Common lessons from user accounts: keep receipts, act before the next billing date, and use a cancellation method that produces verifiable proof. Users who relied on ephemeral messages or incomplete logs often found it hard to convince banks and regulators. Users who retained receipts and used a verifiable dispatch method reported better results when seeking refunds. Paraphrased user comments found in public reviews emphasize the emotional cost of chasing repeated charges and the relief of having clear evidence to present when asking for help.
company identity and contact address
When you send registered notice, use the company’s legal address for formal communications. The official address associated with the operator is: NeoCortext, Inc., 651 N. Broad St. Ste. 201, Middletown DE 19709, New Castle County, USA Delaware State, United States, registration number 7226991. Using the legal address is important when a formal record of delivery is required, and reviewers commonly recommend addressing notices to the corporate address for maximum effect.
what to expect after sending registered mail
Expect a window for acknowledgement. A legitimate business will typically confirm receipt and note the effective date of cancellation. If the business keeps billing, use your registered mail record when disputing charges. If you are seeking a refund for recent charges, present the registered-mail proof with your purchase records to the processor or regulator. Keep calm, stick to the documented facts, and escalate methodically if needed.
what to do if billing continues after registered notice
First, compile the timeline: purchase date, billing dates, registered dispatch date and delivery confirmation, and bank statements showing charges. Second, contact your card issuer or payment provider to open a dispute or chargeback claim and supply the documentation. Third, consider filing a complaint with consumer protection authorities if the charges are persistent or if you suspect deceptive practices. Keeping communication factual and documented improves the chance of a favorable resolution.
how to frame disputes and complaints
Present the facts in chronological order. Use the registered mail proof as the centerpiece: it shows when you communicated your cancellation request and when the company gained notice. Attach receipts and billing records. If you file with a regulator, include a concise narrative, the documentation, and a clear statement of the relief you seek. Regulators and banks receive many complaints, so a tidy, evidence-based packet helps reviewers process your case faster.
what to do after canceling Reface AI
After you send registered notice and confirm the cancellation, monitor your bank statements for at least two billing cycles. Keep a copy of the registered-mail receipt and any delivery confirmation. If a new charge appears, open a dispute promptly with the card issuer and submit your documentation. Consider filing a consumer complaint with the relevant state attorney general or with the Federal Trade Commission if the issue persists. Preserve all records until you receive a final resolution. Act sooner rather than later.
| feature | reface ai | alternatives (general) |
|---|---|---|
| main offering | face swap, ai avatars, headshots | various ai image and video editors |
| pricing model | in-app subscriptions: weekly/monthly/annual (examples) | subscription or pay-per-item |
| evidence for disputes | app receipts and third-party purchase logs | similar; keep receipts and records |
If you need independent help, consumer advocacy groups and the Better Business Bureau collect complaints and may offer dispute-resolution options. When preparing a case, present a clear timeline supported by receipts and by the registered mailing proof. A methodical, evidence-first approach helps clarify facts for banks and regulators.