Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Iq Academy offers online IQ tests, personalised score reports and ongoing “learning” content delivered after a paid interaction. The site positions itself as a quick assessment plus a subscription service that unlocks follow-up materials and recommendations. Many public reviews describe the initial test as low-cost or near-free with a follow-up payment required to view results or receive a report.
Multiple consumer reports indicate that a paid result often leads to a recurring membership charge rather than a one-off fee, and that the recurring amount reported by users frequently appears as a larger monthly subscription rather than the small initial fee. These patterns appear repeatedly in Australian-facing review sites and international review platforms.
Users commonly report three concrete themes: an initial low-cost payment that becomes a recurring charge, difficulty stopping further bills, and limited or delayed refunds. Several reviews reference a recurring charge figure in the vicinity of £39.99 or similar European prices that, when converted, are approximately A$80. This approximate conversion reflects recent exchange rates and helps explain the A$ amounts users in Australia see on statements.
Public review platforms contain direct user quotes that describe unexpected subscription billing, repeated charges after attempted cancellation, and poor responses from support. These accounts are consistent enough to form a pattern rather than isolated incidents.
Reports indicate refunds are possible but inconsistent: some customers received partial refunds after escalation while others were unsuccessful and resorted to disputing charges with their bank. Keep this variability in mind when planning next steps - assume a dispute may be necessary and prepare supporting documentation.
Practical takeaway: treat the initial transaction and any follow-up billing as potentially recurring until you have clear, written confirmation that the subscription was ended and no further charges will occur.
Structure: Iq Academy appears to operate on a low-fee entry that transitions to a recurring membership offering additional content. Users report monthly billing cycles and recurring amounts reported in foreign currencies that convert to roughly A$70 - A$90, depending on exchange rates at the time of the charge.
Notice periods: The service does not consistently advertise a standard notice period in reviews; many users describe being charged within a few days after the initial payment. Expect short windows between the trial/initial charge and the first recurring payment.
Billing cycles and proration: Where users describe monthly charges, proration is rarely reported. That means if a subscription converts immediately, refunds or pro rata credits are not commonly observed in public accounts.
Cooling-off and digital goods: Under consumer practice discussed by Australian banks and consumer guides, digital content and immediate access items often have limited automatic cooling-off rights. For a service like Iq Academy, this typically means that a short “trial” can convert to a paid subscription quickly and that statutory cooling-off periods may not guarantee a full refund for consumed digital content. Plan accordingly.
Refund behaviour: Public feedback shows mixed outcomes. Some customers received refunds after persistent follow-up; others had to raise disputes with their card issuer to recover funds. Prepare for a multi-step approach if you pursue a refund.
| Plan type | Typical billing cycle | Reported amount (AUD, approx) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial pay-for-result | One-off (often low) | Varies (reported low entry fee) | Users frequently describe a small initial fee to access results. |
| Recurring membership reported by users | Monthly (reported) | Approx A$80 | Many reviews cite a recurring charge near £39.99 which converts to roughly A$80 (approx). Amounts vary by exchange rate and card issuer. |
| Other/hidden variations | Varies | Varies | Some users report multiple unexpected charges or annual-style billing; official plan structure is not consistently visible in public reports. |
| Feature | Initial low-fee purchase | Reported recurring membership |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility of recurring terms | Often limited or in fine print | Often unclear until charged |
| Refund likelihood (based on public reports) | Variable | Lower without escalation; disputes sometimes required |
| Cancellation friction | Low immediate friction | High friction reported by users |
Short guide: For a service like Iq Academy, the Australian consumer framework provides protections against misleading conduct and unfair practices, but remedies vary for digital goods and subscriptions. If the charge appears unauthorised, your financial institution has procedures for disputing transactions and the card networks operate chargeback rules.
Escalation paths: If direct merchant resolution fails, banks typically support cardholders with dispute processes that require evidence you should already have collected. If your bank’s outcome is unsatisfactory, you may be able to bring a complaint to a financial complaints scheme; time limits apply so act promptly.
Expect a two-track process: merchant-side refund attempts and, if unsuccessful, a bank/card dispute. Public reports show refunds sometimes occur after persistence, but many customers resort to disputing transactions with their bank to recover funds.
Timing matters: banks and issuers have specific windows for disputes and may provisionally credit amounts while investigating. Provide precise, dated evidence to the bank to support claims of unauthorised or misleading charges.
Actionable next steps: monitor bank and card statements for at least two billing cycles after cancellation and keep a watch for any reappearing charges that match the merchant descriptor you recorded. If you see further debits, follow your bank’s dispute process promptly and supply the documentation checklist items you prepared earlier.
If disputes fail: consider lodging a formal complaint through your financial institution’s external dispute resolution process. Keep timelines in mind and escalate early if you continue to be billed after taking reasonable steps to stop the charges.
Final pragmatic tip: treat the situation as both a consumer protection matter and a payments dispute. A combined approach - documenting the merchant interactions visibly and lodging a timely bank dispute - produces the best chance of recovery based on public user outcomes.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Grace Lee
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.