Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Shaw Academy is an online education provider offering structured courses and certificate tracks across subjects such as digital marketing, finance, photography, health and wellbeing, and technology. The service markets time-bound trial periods and paid memberships that grant access to live classes, recordings and assessment material.
The provider’s published terms refer to recurring membership subscriptions (monthly, quarterly, bi‑annual, annual and lifetime options) and state limits on refunds for partial membership periods unless there is a defined just cause.
The company is registered in Dublin and has historically attracted both positive course reviews and significant consumer complaints about billing and cancellations.
Many cancellations arise from unexpected charges after promotional trials, dissatisfaction with course content or value, and duplicated or continuing charges despite attempted cancellation.
Others cancel because of administrative errors, changes in personal circumstances, or because they no longer require ongoing access to course materials and assessment.
Framework: Shaw Academy operates subscription-based access where membership fees recur on the agreed billing cycle unless the subscription is ended before the payment date. The terms state that continuing a membership authorises recurring charges to the stored payment method.
Notice periods and billing cycles: Memberships are billed on the plan’s cycle. If a membership is not ended before the next payment date the provider will attempt to process the next periodic fee. This creates an operational cutoff tied to the billing cycle rather than arbitrary notice windows.
Proration and partial periods: Shaw Academy’s terms indicate that refunds for partial membership periods are not provided except where a defined just cause applies. Consequently, you should treat billing periods as whole units for refund expectations.
Cooling-off and free trial conversions: The provider has offered free trial periods historically. Regulatory action has shown that trial-to-subscription conversions have been a source of disputes when cancellations were purportedly made within trial timeframes but charges still occurred. The ACCC required refunds to consumers where cancellations did not work as represented.
Refunds and just cause: The written terms limit refunds for subscriptions and optional course purchases unless there is a demonstrable contractual or pricing error (a just cause). The practical implication is that consumers will often need supporting evidence to obtain a refund.
Public reviews and forum posts show recurrent complaints that users were charged during or after advertised free trials, or that charges continued despite attempted cancellation. Complaints appear on mainstream review platforms and community forums.
Representative feedback includes short, direct claims such as: "I was charged during my free trial" and reports of repeated attempts to stop renewals. These snippets are consistent across multiple review sites.
1. System failures and documentation gaps: Consumers report failures in cancellation systems or unclear prompt language that can lead to unintended purchases. Regulatory scrutiny has resulted in refunds to affected consumers where the systems did not allow effective cancellation.
2. Chargebacks as a remedy: Several reviewers note successful recoveries via payment-provider disputes when refunds from the provider were not forthcoming. This is a recourse where contractual remedies are ineffective or slow.
Official public terms describe multiple billing frequencies but do not publish exhaustive AU price lists in the terms. Third‑party reviews and comparisons have reported typical membership categories; below is a synthesis with approximate AUD conversions where third‑party sources provided numeric values. Treat these figures as indicative only.
| Plan type | Billing cadence | Reported or typical price (approx) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | Monthly | Varies (reported third‑party ranges; see notes) |
| Quarterly | Every 3 months | Reported approx A$58 - A$90/month equivalent (third‑party reports; varies by promotion). |
| Half‑yearly | Every 6 months | Varies |
| Annual | Every 12 months | Reported approx A$28 - A$60/month equivalent (third‑party comparison figures converted using recent USD→AUD mid rates). |
| Lifetime / one‑off | Single payment | Reported approx A$150 - A$170 (one‑off) in some reviews; availability varies. |
| Feature | Shaw Academy (reported) | Typical competitors |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | Commonly offered; disputes reported where trial converted to paid plan without effective cancellation. | Free trials or sample lessons; clearer cancellation controls typical |
| Refund policy | Terms restrict refunds for partial periods; refunds allowed for defined just cause and per regulatory remedial actions. | Varies by provider; many offer short refund windows or pro rata refunds |
| Optional paid materials | Toolkits, hard copy certificates and final assessments may attract additional fees per reviews. | Often available but priced transparently |
Ambiguous offer language: where advertising and the checkout process are inconsistent with the terms, contract law may treat the consumer offer and actual conduct of the business as determinative. Misleading representations tied to trials or cost disclosure can give rise to statutory consumer claims.
Payment authorisation and recurring charges: under the provider’s terms a stored payment method authorises recurring charges. If a consumer reasonably cancelled before a renewal but a charge occurs, the issue becomes whether the cancellation mechanism was effective and reliable under the contract.
Regulatory oversight: the ACCC has enforced remediation where a subscription provider’s systems prevented effective cancellation. Consequently, consumers may have statutory support where the cancellation process is defective.
If you believe you were charged in error and contractual remedies are ineffective, consider a payment dispute with the bank or payment provider and keep the documentation checklist above ready. Payment reversals are procedural remedies outside the provider’s direct control and can be effective where proof supports an unauthorised or incorrect charge.
Furthermore, lodging a complaint with the relevant regulator can be appropriate where systemic collapse of cancellation controls appears demonstrated. The ACCC public action against Shaw Academy is an example of regulator intervention that resulted in refunds for affected customers.
Expect an administrative lag: providers often have processing lead times between receiving a cancellation and updating billing systems. Monitor your account and statements for at least two billing cycles after a cancellation attempt.
Keep records: a dated trail showing when you acted is essential for any later dispute. Documentation materially improves the chance of recovery via the provider or payment channels.
After you take cancellation steps, continue to monitor your payment statements and keep the documentation checklist. If you see unauthorised renewals, initiate a payment dispute with your issuer and prepare the evidence outlined above.
If the charge remains and appears systemic, consider lodging a complaint with the consumer regulator and retain all records of communication and transactions. Regulatory agencies have previously secured refunds for consumers in comparable situations.
Finally, where optional paid items were billed (toolkits, assessments, hard copy certificates), verify whether the purchase meets the contractual definition of a separate sale; if it does not, include that point in any dispute evidence.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Chloe Lee
Former postal advisor · 7 years experience
Former postal-services advisor and e-signature specialist, I have been writing for Postclic for 7 years to demystify legally binding mail for everyday users.