Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Artgrid is a stock video subscription service that licences high-quality, story-driven footage for commercial and personal use. It provides tiered unlimited-download plans that differ by resolution and file formats, from HD H.264 up to RAW/LOG and ProRes/DNxHR options.
Artgrid publishes monthly-equivalent prices but its licences are only available on an annual billing basis, so you pay yearly while the site shows a month-by-month comparand. This annual-only billing model influences refund and renewal mechanics.
Third-party pricing summaries list three main tiers (junior, creator, pro) with widely reported monthly-equivalent amounts. Use these as context for financial planning rather than precise checkout totals.
| Plan | Monthly equivalent (approx) | Typical annual charge (billed annually, approx) |
|---|---|---|
| Junior | A$30/month (approx) | A$358/year (approx) |
| Creator | A$45/month (approx) | A$536/year (approx) |
| Pro | A$74/month (approx) | A$894/year (approx) |
Notes: the table converts reported USD figures to AUD using current exchange ranges and treats the monthly column as a budgeting metric since charges are applied annually. Exact amounts at checkout can vary with tax and payment provider conversion.
Because Artgrid sells licences on an annual billing cycle, a subscription renewal will usually charge for the next 12 months at the renewal date equivalent. From a financial perspective, this means timing is critical: a late action close to a renewal date can convert a planned short-term use into a full-year cost.
Proration is not commonly applied to annual licences: stopping access mid-year does not normally produce a pro rata refund for the unused portion. Refund eligibility depends on specific timing windows and licence conditions.
Cooling-off or trial-window rules are frequently cited in consumer disputes. Artgrid advertises a money-back or trial window in some marketing content, but vendors and users disagree on how downloads during that period affect refund eligibility. Expect the provider to treat downloaded assets as reducing refund entitlement in many complaints.
Public reviews show a pattern: many positive comments about footage quality and value for heavy users, coupled with repeated complaints about renewal charges, opaque account controls, and slow responses to refund requests. Trustpilot entries across regions frequently mention unexpected annual charges and difficulty confirming cancellation status.
Some reviewers report being charged an annual fee when they expected a month-to-month arrangement, and others say they were denied refunds because assets were downloaded during the trial/claim window. These items recur in independent customer feedback.
From a financial perspective, calculate your cost per useful download and compare that to one-off licensing or alternative subscriptions. Heavy users who download many clips can justify an annual licence; light or occasional users should compare the effective annual cost against pay-per-asset platforms.
Consider opportunity cost: an unused annual licence represents locked capital that could be redeployed. If your projects are irregular, an annual commitment may be less efficient than platform alternatives or single-asset purchases.
| Option | Typical licence scope | Relative cost signal |
|---|---|---|
| Artgrid (junior/creator/pro) | Unlimited downloads, tiered by resolution and file format | High upfront annual cost; better value for frequent, high-resolution use. |
| Pay-per-asset marketplaces | Single licences per clip; scalable spend | Lower short-term spend; higher marginal cost if many clips are required |
| Competing subscription services | Varying limits, some monthly options | Potentially lower annual outlay for light users; feature and licensing differences matter |
Refund rules hinge on the timing of the request, the provider's stated money-back policies, and whether licence conditions treat downloaded assets as used content. Expect a provider to reference its terms when denying refunds.
From a consumer-rights and financial-advisor viewpoint, escalate methodically: document everything, meet internal complaint steps, and if unresolved consider your bank's dispute process as a financial remedy option. Keep the timeline tight when lodging disputes because time limits apply for chargeback claims.
Warning: banks assess chargebacks against merchant evidence; a successful dispute often requires clear documentation that a refund or cancellation request was made before renewal or that the merchant failed to honour advertised terms.
Act quickly to gather transaction records and any supporting documentation showing intent or prior communications. From a budgeting standpoint, quantify how this charge affects your short-term cashflow and consider temporary liquidity steps if needed.
For dispute preparedness, compile evidence that demonstrates the date of renewal, any trial or refund terms you relied on, and a usage log showing whether you downloaded assets during the relevant period. Strong documentation materially increases the chance of a successful recovery.
After a cancellation action is processed, update your budgeting forecasts to remove the recurring liability and reallocate the freed capital to higher-priority projects or to a contingency buffer.
Audit your content library and note which assets are licensed for lifetime use under the licence terms and which may be affected by subscription status; this affects ongoing content value and project continuity.
Finally, review alternative licensing strategies and set calendar reminders well before future renewals to avoid unexpected annual charges; treat subscription renewals as planned expenditure in your cashflow model.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Grace Lee
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.