Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Facer is a platform and app that distributes custom watch faces and related premium content for smartwatches. It offers a free tier, a mid-tier called Facer Plus and a higher tier called Facer Premium that unlocks access to premium faces, removes ads and increases watchbox storage. Official support documentation lists those tiers and advertises a 30-day free trial for select devices as well as regional availability limitations.
From a product perspective, Facer acts both as a marketplace for individual paid faces and as a subscription service that bundles many paid faces into an ongoing membership. Pricing shown in app store listings is in US dollars and in-app purchases vary by platform; reviewers report different billed amounts and occasional promotional first-year pricing.
Below is a practical comparison of the common plans and the features each plan typically advertises. Prices shown in USD storefronts were converted to AUD and marked as approximate when no direct AU listing was available. Use the table to evaluate ongoing cost versus one-off purchases.
| Plan | Main features | Typical store price (approx) |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Basic access to free faces; limited watchbox; ads | Free |
| Facer Plus | Ad free; slightly larger watchbox; limited premium access | Varies |
| Facer Premium | Access to premium faces library; ad free; increased watchbox; syncing perks | A$7.45/month approx or A$29.84/year approx (converted from USD storefront prices). Approx conversion used. |
Promotional pricing has been reported in press coverage for specific platform launches (for example, promotional first-year pricing such as A$22.50 approx for year one). Renewal pricing and geography-specific offers vary by release and platform.
Considering that Facer sells both individual faces and subscription bundles, billing route matters: subscriptions billed through an app marketplace are administratively different to subscriptions billed directly by the platform. This affects who processes refunds and handles renewals.
In most reported cases, a cancellation is meant to stop future billings while allowing access for the remainder of the paid billing period. Proration for unused time is not guaranteed; refunds for partial periods depend on the plan terms and whether the supplier considers the issue a major failure under consumer law.
From a financial perspective, annual plans concentrate cost and can be attractive when effective unit price per month is low. However, annual prepayment increases exposure to service interruption risk if the service fails to perform or is removed. Many users report losing access to paid faces when a subscription lapses, which affects perceived value.
Digital subscriptions may be subject to consumer guarantees. If a subscription fails to deliver core advertised features, a refund or pro rata credit may be required under consumer law. Cooling-off rights for unsolicited agreements or specific merchant terms can also apply; check the legal entitlement when assessing potential refund value.
Public reviews and community threads show several recurring themes: unexpected charges or higher-than-advertised billed amounts, difficulty stopping recurring charges, and slow or unhelpful support responses. One reviewer wrote: "They charged me $50, and they have denied all refund requests." Other reports describe the subscription auto-converting after a trial and trouble reclaiming the refund.
Community support threads include examples where users believed they had cancelled but continued to be billed for subsequent cycles. Several entries advise checking whether billing occurs via the platform or a third-party storefront because resolution channels differ.
From a financial perspective, reclaiming funds can follow multiple paths: merchant refund (preferred), marketplace refund, or bank/card dispute. The effective outcome depends on who billed the charge and the legal basis for the claim.
Chargebacks may stop future debits quickly but can carry administrative risk and potentially affect future merchant relationships. Consider the cost-benefit: for under A$30 recurring monthly plans, aggressive dispute routes may not be proportionate. For annual charges measured in A$ tens to low hundreds, a documented dispute has greater financial logic.
| Option | Value proposition | Financial trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly premium | Lower short-term commitment; easy to test | Higher annualised cost if kept long term |
| Annual premium | Lower unit cost per month; best for heavy users | Higher up-front outlay and higher exposure if service fails |
| One-off face purchases | Pay once for a single face; avoid ongoing fees | Limited selection; may be more expensive per face over time |
Consumer guarantees apply to digital content and subscription services. If Facer fails to supply advertised features or the service has a major failure, you may be entitled to a remedy such as repair, replacement or refund under the Australian Consumer Law. Cooling-off rights exist for certain unsolicited agreements and refund entitlements may depend on whether the purchase was made through a third-party billing route. Keep evidence when asserting a legal right.
Expect the following financial and service outcomes: access to premium features will usually continue until the paid period expires; you may not receive pro rata refunds unless terms or consumer guarantees require one. Monitor bank statements for any unexpected subsequent charges.
If there is an unresolved billed amount, evaluate the financial cost of escalating the claim versus accepting a partial loss. For recurring monthly plans under A$15, the administrative cost of disputes can exceed the refund value. For larger annual bills, escalation is typically more justified.
Finally, consider replacing the subscription with a lower-cost alternative or one-off purchases if the value is unclear. From a budgeting perspective, cancelling an underused subscription and reallocating the annual cost into a designated "watch face budget" can prevent future wasted spend.
Key actions: keep complete records, check whether the charge was processed by an app marketplace or the service itself, evaluate proration/refund eligibility under consumer guarantees, and weigh dispute costs against the disputed amount.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Zoe Wright
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.