Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Total Adblock is a commercial ad blocking service marketed as a browser and mobile ad blocker that is part of the Total Security product family. It is offered with a free/basic option and paid premium subscriptions that claim broader coverage (YouTube ad removal, tracker blocking and cookie consent pop-up suppression) plus multi-device support through associated Total Security products.
Subscription offerings appear as in-app purchases on major app stores and as billed online; published in-app prices include a Monthly plan and Annual plans with promotional first-term pricing commonly applied. The service emphasises automatic renewal and promotional introductory rates that change to a regular renewal rate after the first term.
| Plan | Typical AU price (source) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free / basic | A$0 | Limited browser-only blocking; excludes some advanced features. |
| Monthly premium | A$12.99 (in‑app listing) | Auto-renews at end of billing period; promotional first-term prices may differ. |
| Annual premium | A$79.90 (in‑app listing) | Often promoted with a discounted first year; renewal at regular annual rate. |
Total Adblock operates on recurring billing with automatic renewal at the end of each subscription period. The vendor documents that promotional pricing usually applies only to the first billing period and that renewals occur at the regular rate unless the subscription is cancelled before renewal.
For app store purchases, the merchant notes that charges are applied through the platform used for purchase and that the platform's billing timing rules apply (for example a charge may occur within 24 hours before the renewal date). The service also states subscribers receive renewal reminders up to 30 days before renewal for annual plans.
From a financial perspective, promotional first-term prices can create a large discontinuity between the trial cost and the renewal cost. For example, an advertised first-year rate can be a fraction of the regular price that appears on renewal; this creates an effective increase at renewal that materially affects household budgets unless monitored.
Public feedback shows a mixed product experience: many users praise ad blocking effectiveness while a substantial cohort reports billing and cancellation friction. Complaints include multiple or unexpected charges, difficulty obtaining refunds, and problems stopping renewals. Several reviewers describe success obtaining refunds through their card issuer rather than the vendor.
Representative user comments include short customer statements about repeated billing and confusing cancellation flows. One reviewer described the process as "nearly impossible to cancel" and others described recurring unauthorised charges that required a payment dispute. These kinds of direct customer reports appear across consumer review sites and discussion forums.
Recurring themes from customer feedback that have direct financial consequences are: unexpected renewal amounts after promotional periods, perceived multiple charges in a short period, and variable refund outcomes. These patterns point to two financial risks: ongoing unnoticed small charges that compound over months, and episodic large renewals that can disrupt a budget.
Practical takeaways: treat promotional sign-ups as time‑limited offers, reconcile the first purchase confirmation against the renewal terms, and monitor bank or card statements for billing frequency anomalies. When refunds are discussed publicly, resolution often involves third-party payment providers rather than direct vendor action.
The company publishes a money-back guarantee and a refunds policy; however, eligibility depends on plan type, timing of the request relative to the purchase, and whether the purchase was via an app platform or directly. App store purchases are subject to the platform's refund rules; direct purchases are governed by the vendor's billing policy and any advertised guarantees.
From a financial perspective, the most material items to check are: whether a promotional price converts to a higher renewal rate, whether early termination leads to proration or no refund, and the cut-off times for claiming a refund under any money-back guarantee. In practice, users report mixed outcomes for refunds and that timely action increases chances of a favourable outcome.
If an account was billed multiple times in error, public reports indicate some consumers successfully obtained reversals through their card issuer or payment platform dispute mechanisms when vendor resolution failed. Those dispute processes are external financial remedies with their own timelines and evidentiary requirements.
| Scenario | Likely financial outcome |
|---|---|
| Promotional first term then renews at regular rate | Significant increase at renewal; annual may still be cheaper than 12 monthly payments (example: A$12.99 x 12 = A$155.88 vs A$79.90 annual). |
| Multiple unexpected charges in short period | May require payment dispute or refund request; public reports show variable vendor responsiveness. |
| App store purchase | Refunds and cancellation timing may be controlled by the app platform's policies rather than the vendor's stated policy. |
| Feature | Free / basic | Premium (monthly / annual) |
|---|---|---|
| Ad blocking scope | Browser-level only | Browser + expanded coverage including YouTube ad blocking and cookie pop-up removal |
| Device limit | Usually single browser | Unlimited devices advertised for premium |
| Support and money-back guarantee | Limited | Money-back guarantee often advertised for premium purchases |
When a charge is unexpected, act quickly to assemble the documentation checklist above and record the amounts, dates and merchant descriptor as it appears on your statement. Time is financially material: many dispute windows start from the date a charge posts.
From an optimisation perspective, compare the annual total cost of monthly billing versus an annual plan. Using listed in-app prices as an example, monthly at A$12.99 equates to A$155.88 over 12 months versus an annual listing at A$79.90, making the annual plan materially cheaper if you intend to retain the service for a full year. Check whether the promotional first-term rate masks that comparison.
If a refund is granted, verify whether the vendor applies proration or issues a full return for the billed period; reported experiences show outcomes vary by purchase channel and timing.
After cancellation, prioritise ongoing financial controls: monitor your bank and card statements for at least two billing cycles and flag any unexpected posts. Retain all documentation for at least 90 days in case a renewal posts and you need to escalate a dispute.
From a budgeting standpoint, reallocate the saved subscription cost into an alternative solution or a contingency fund. If you previously paid A$12.99 monthly, that is about A$155.88 a year; switching to a properly priced annual plan or a free alternative could free material cash flow.
If you plan to replace the service, evaluate the cost per device and the practical benefit you actually received in a typical month. In terms of value, prefer solutions where trial-to-renewal jumps are small and where refunds or cancellation terms are transparent.
Finally, set a calendar reminder ahead of the next renewal date for any future subscriptions so promotional-to-regular price transitions are visible well before charges occur. This small administrative step reduces the risk of sudden budget impact from an unexpected renewal.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Grace Lee
Regulatory watch · 8 years experience
Legal analyst tracking eIDAS, GDPR and electronic delivery regulations for 8 years to make sure every Postclic template is compliant and admissible in court.