Postclic premium unlimited: promotional offer at $1.61 for 48h, then $87.71 per month without commitment

Cancellation service #1 in Australia
Medify is a digital test preparation platform focused on medical school entry exams and interview preparation. The service provides question banks, mock exams, performance analytics and preparatory courses for UCAT, GAMSAT and interview practice, bundled into single subscriptions that grant access to these learning resources.
Medify offers a single subscription model with weekly, monthly and yearly billing options priced in AUD and a free tier with limited content. The platform indicates that paid plans include practice questions with explanations, mock exams and performance analytics across UCAT, GAMSAT, interviews and A-level content. Recent product updates also consolidated access so a single active subscription covers all core courses.
| Plan | Billing description | Typical AUD price |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Short-term weekly access | A$35/week |
| Monthly | Billed monthly | A$65/month |
| Yearly | Annual billing, best value | A$450/year |
These prices and plan structures are published on Medify's regional pricing pages and are presented in AUD for local customers. The site lists the same core features across plans while varying the billing period and per-week equivalent.
Public reviews and complaint threads show a mixture of positive learning outcomes and dissatisfaction linked to billing and renewal interactions. Several reviewers praise the question bank and mock exams; other reviewers report unexpected renewals, disputes over unauthorised charges and requests for refunds that were declined or reduced by refund processing fees.
Medify's public replies on review platforms and its help pages acknowledge automatic renewals and state that access continues until the current billing period expires. The terms of service indicate refunds are generally not available but may be offered at Medify's discretion, subject to a processing fee for Australia and New Zealand.
Reports commonly identify three friction points: timing of renewal notices, perceived difficulty obtaining full refunds, and confusion about what paid access covers after recent product bundling. Users who received partial refunds indicate the company applies a processing deduction. Review responses from Medify reference recurring subscription terms and discretionary refunds.
Practical takeaways from public feedback: verify billing dates, keep records of access and transactions, and expect that refunds are exceptional and may incur a processing fee.
Framework: Medify treats subscriptions as recurring services that continue until the billing period ends; cancellation stops future renewals but does not usually terminate already-paid access. The vendor states that access remains active until the current subscription period expires.
Notice periods and timing: Medify recommends cancelling in advance of the renewal date to avoid unintended charges, specifically suggesting a short lead time prior to the renewal. This is consistent with its guidance that cancelling before the next renewal prevents future billing while preserving current access until period end.
Refunds and proration: Medify's terms state that subscribers are generally not entitled to refunds. Where Medify chooses to provide a refund for an unused subscription, it applies a processing fee; for Australia and New Zealand the published processing fee is A$10. Consequently, requests for pro rata refunds or immediate termination refunds should be considered unlikely unless granted as a discretionary remedy.
Cooling-off and consumer remedies: there is no extended unconditional cooling-off statement on Medify's public pages; customers should treat the billing commitment as effective on purchase and rely on statutory consumer protections only where a product failure or misrepresentation can be shown.
In accordance with Australian consumer protection principles, automatic renewal and subscription disclosures must be transparent and not misleading. Regulatory action against other digital subscription providers demonstrates enforcement focus on clarity of renewal terms and fair cancellation practices. If Medify's representations about renewal or access were misleading, statutory remedies under consumer law could be engaged.
Practical implication for Medify users: remedies under consumer law typically require evidence of a significant failure, misleading conduct, or an unfair term. For routine billing disputes the commercial terms (including the published processing fee) are likely to govern outcomes unless a regulator finds systemic non-compliance.
| Plan | Billing cycle | Key inclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Weekly charge | Study notes, question bank, mock exams, performance analytics |
| Monthly | Monthly charge | Full access to UCAT/GAMSAT/interview/A-level content and analytics |
| Yearly | Annual charge | Same core features, lower effective weekly cost |
These feature descriptions derive from Medify's published plan information and product updates confirming the unified subscription approach. Use the table to align subscription length with intended study timelines.
Dispute framework: when a renewal charge appears that a cardholder contests, the first legal step is to assemble the documentation above and then raise the dispute through formal consumer dispute channels available under banking and card schemes. Keep all records of transactions and communications as evidence for any chargeback request or formal complaint.
Refund expectations: Medify's contract language treats refunds as exceptional and discretionary, and specifies a processing fee for refunds in Australia and New Zealand. That contractual position does not extinguish statutory consumer remedies where there is a material failure to provide services or where the company engaged in misleading conduct.
Regulatory routes: if a consumer believes that renewal practices were not adequately disclosed or that a refund was wrongly withheld, a written complaint to a relevant external dispute body or a report to a competition regulator may be appropriate. Regulatory review typically requires clear factual records showing the timeline and representations made.
After you stop future renewals, retain all transaction records and the cancellation confirmation or evidence that cancellation was registered. Monitor your billing statements for at least two subsequent cycles to confirm no further charges occur.
If you receive an unexpected charge after cancellation, gather documentary evidence, check the timestamped records showing cancellation relative to the renewal date, and escalate through the appropriate card dispute channels and consumer complaint avenues if needed. Use regulator guidance where there is an indication of misleading renewal disclosures.
Finally, if you expect a discretionary refund, document the circumstance that supports the refund request (unused subscription period, demonstrable error, or misrepresentation). Prepare evidence of the processing fee that Medify may apply and evaluate the commercial reasonableness of accepting any partial refund offered.
Already sent a letter? Enter its tracking number to see its proof of dispatch and certified timestamp.
Written by Ethan Martin
Digital-law graduate · 4 years experience
Graduate in digital law and passionate about secure written communication, I have been writing guides on certified mail and electronic registered delivery for 4 years.